Disclaimer
Required by the FDA
This website is for educational purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for the diagnosis, treatment, and advice of a qualified licensed professional. This site offers people medical information and tells them their alternative medical options, but in no way should anyone consider that this site represents the practice of medicine. This site assumes no responsibility for how this material is used. Also note that this website frequently updates its contents, due to a variety of reasons, therefore, some information may be out of date. The statements regarding alternative treatments for cancer have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration.
Purpose of Cancer Tutor
The purpose of this website is to provide the most accurate and up-to-date information on alternative cancer treatments. The information is to let cancer patients and / or their caregivers have the information necessary to let them know which alternative cancer treatment options exist.
Thus the purpose of this site is to let cancer patients:
- Quickly learn about their best alternative cancer treatment options, so they can
- Make their cancer treatment decisions more quickly, and thus they can
- Start their alternative cancer treatment sooner than they could by doing their own research.
No cancer treatment products are sold from this website and every attempt is made to make statements which are unbiased and are solely in the best interest of the cancer patient.
Use of the term ‘cure'
Because Cancer Tutor uses the term “cure,” it is necessary to delineate what “cure” means.
If the general public were asked what it means to cure cancer, he or she would undoubtedly say that a cancer patient was cured if their cancer was gone and they were no longer using prescription drugs.
This website uses the alternative medicine definition of cure: A person is cured of their cancer if the number of cancer cells in their body is less than, or equal to, the number of cancer cells in the average person. It is also hoped that their immune system is able to kill newly developing cancer cells (every person has newly developed cancer cells).
The definition of cure that orthodox medicine uses is this: A cancer patient is cured if they live five years from the date of their diagnosis of cancer. (This definition changes from time to time.)
This definition of cure ignores the physical condition of the patient, it ignores the strength of their immune system, it ignores how many cancer cells they have, and it ignores how long they are expected to live after the 5-year mark. For example, if they die 5 years and 2 days after they were first diagnosed, they are counted as a cured cancer patient. Furthermore, cancer patients who die too quickly are not counted by orthodox medicine. In fact, they use many tricks to make their treatments look far more effective than they really are.
Why does orthodox medicine use a definition of cure which is so vastly different than what the man on the street would use The reason is that orthodox medicine has no interest in curing cancer the way the man on the street wants cancer to be cured. Their definition is designed to make orthodox medicine look good if they are able to convert cancer into a chronic disease. Orthodox medicine does not like people to use the term cure because they have no interest in curing cancer.
About alternative cancer treatments
Alternative cancer treatments can actually have one of three different outcomes:
- Those whose cancer is gone and who never get cancer again because their cancer cells have been killed, or reverted into normal cells, and their immune system has been built up and their lifestyle has changed.
- Those who have the vast majority of their cancer cells killed or reverted into normal cells, but for one of many different reasons, such as going back to their old lifestyle, and cancer does return. In this case, there is a high probability that they will know what to do the second time around.
- Those who do not survive their cancer. This can happen because the wrong treatment was chosen or prior orthodox cancer treatments did irreversible damage. In any case, it is almost certain that the alternative cancer treatments improved and extended their life far beyond what orthodox medicine could have done.
Alternative cancer treatments would have a much higher true cure rate if all cancer patients used alternative cancer treatments exclusively (in most cases) as soon as they were diagnosed. In other words, the true cure rate of alternative cancer treatments is severely hampered because alternative medicine has lost many months (or years) of treatment time before most cancer patients start their alternative cancer treatment.
About orthodox cancer treatments
Orthodox medicine has had many opportunities to establish treatments that cured cancer (using the alternative medicine definition of cure). In every case, they have rejected such treatments in favor of far more profitable treatments.
With rare exceptions, orthodox medicine has designed treatments to make cancer into a chronic, highly profitable disease. Their search for more profitable treatments will continue until they are forced by public outcry to use treatments that cure cancer the way many alternative cancer treatments cure cancer (e.g. medical doctors would be forced by their patients to use natural substances).
This is why orthodox medicine does not like it when alternative medicine uses the term cure. If you wish to use the orthodox definition of cure as you read Cancer Tutor, and you do not like the alternative medicine definition of cure, then as you read the articles on this website, simply substitute any use of the term cure with the term treatment or spontaneous remission.
Furthermore, orthodox medicine does not like people to know of their alternative cancer treatment options. Thus, it can be stated that orthodox medicine does not like websites that tell people about their alternative cancer treatment options.